(September 18, 2012 at 1:44 am)Moros Synackaon Wrote:(September 17, 2012 at 11:29 pm)Puddleglum Wrote: 2) If a person is extradited to a country if a third party wishes to extradite him to their country then they must have the permission of both the original country and the one that now holds that person. So it would be twice the trouble to extradite him to the USA, so why is it easier to extradite him from sweden to the USA than from the UK?
I cannot find information as to such, nor a legal mechanism to enforce it. Can you provide some source material?
(September 18, 2012 at 7:48 am)Puddleglum Wrote: ....Snipped I've also read this in the news (don't remember where, it was linked off of Google News), but Sweden has already shown blatant disregard for their own law as well as international law regarding extradition.(My red bold)
That sounds like great evidence to me. Surely you can find it if it is out there Sweden is a social democrat country with no great love for the US ,it isn't even a NATO member, couple with which the USA hasn't actually asked for him. Unattributed assertions are worthless. You probably read it on some Assangista website
Sweden cannot prevent a US-backed extradition as it is within the US-Sweden treaties unless a set of conditions (threat of torture, death) is m
yes- it needs permission from the UK to do so.Snipped....
I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure Moros Synackaon asked for some proof of your assertion.
