Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 27, 2025, 2:50 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom
#37
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom
(September 18, 2012 at 1:43 pm)Puddleglum Wrote: Ah OK Waratah you wish to see my proof of the need for the UK to approve any further extradition. Well instead of claiming that it was in 'some thing I read and failing to establish it ill happily demonstrate it.

It is contained in article 17 of the Framework of the European arrest warrant

A state wishing to prosecute a surrendered person for offences committed before his or her surrender, or extradite a surrendered person to a third state, must, subject to certain exception, obtain the permission of the executing judicial authority. Such a request is made in the same form as a European Arrest Warrant, and granted or refused using the same rules which determine whether surrender would be granted or refused

You can read more in full Here
It was not me wanting to see proof it was originally Moros Synackaon. I was pointing out that your statement of "unattributed assertions are worthless" was strange since you had done that after being asked pacifically for a source to information provided by you.
(September 18, 2012 at 11:47 pm)Puddleglum Wrote: MY link was to wikipedia and you read it.
I know it was wikipedia, but you said we could read MORE IN FULL. This to me says it would at least have your "Article 17 statement" which I could not find.
Quote:I think we have now established that the UK must agree to a third party extradition
No we have not. Your "Article 17 statement"(Remember different to mine. And I have the link to mine.) which was used to back your claim has not been confirmed. I think what you have established is an unattributed assertion.
I will ask again for you to provide relevant links to back your argument. If not your statement is bullshit. Cool Shades
Quote:If the above is true why hasn't the Swedish authorities done this(question abroad) and why are they so keen to get Assange to Sweden?

No idea. They have an option to do this if they wish. They are choosing not to exercise it as is their legal right.
perhaps they believe they will look stupid if the go to the UK , question him, decide there is a case to answer and he still refuses to come over.
I think they look stupid for not trying to establish the facts before extradition.
Quote:Anyway, quite separately, even if they could extradite him I don't believe they would since it would diminish the status of Sweden amongst other social democratic countries. I don't think the USA would try and undermine Sweden either by attempting to do so but that is just an opinion and not provable.
I have no ideas about Sweden's politics or the relationship between USA and Sweden. I believe the Australia and USA have a close relationship and look what they did to David Hicks. Anything is possible.
Quote:Assange can just stay inside the prison of his own making
Sounds like you have a dislike to Assange.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Tiberius - September 17, 2012 at 1:35 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Minimalist - September 17, 2012 at 1:42 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 17, 2012 at 1:44 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Phish - September 17, 2012 at 1:45 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 17, 2012 at 1:54 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 17, 2012 at 2:14 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Jaysyn - September 17, 2012 at 3:02 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 17, 2012 at 3:23 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by zappa1258 - September 20, 2012 at 12:16 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by 5thHorseman - September 17, 2012 at 2:23 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Faith No More - September 17, 2012 at 2:50 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Rev. Rye - September 17, 2012 at 3:17 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Violet - September 17, 2012 at 3:57 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Rev. Rye - September 17, 2012 at 4:06 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Jackalope - September 17, 2012 at 4:16 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Rev. Rye - September 17, 2012 at 4:27 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Violet - September 17, 2012 at 5:00 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Rev. Rye - September 17, 2012 at 7:38 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by downbeatplumb - September 19, 2012 at 7:21 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by jonb - September 17, 2012 at 4:24 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 17, 2012 at 5:00 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by greneknight - September 17, 2012 at 5:28 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Haydn - September 17, 2012 at 6:14 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by jonb - September 17, 2012 at 7:31 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Autumnlicious - September 17, 2012 at 7:52 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by jonb - September 17, 2012 at 8:00 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 17, 2012 at 10:25 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Waratah - September 17, 2012 at 11:07 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 17, 2012 at 11:29 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Autumnlicious - September 18, 2012 at 1:44 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Jaysyn - September 18, 2012 at 6:16 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 18, 2012 at 7:48 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Jaysyn - September 18, 2012 at 8:08 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Waratah - September 18, 2012 at 8:38 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Violet - September 18, 2012 at 10:05 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 18, 2012 at 1:43 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Waratah - September 18, 2012 at 11:12 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Waratah - September 19, 2012 at 9:32 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 18, 2012 at 11:47 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Waratah - September 19, 2012 at 2:52 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 19, 2012 at 8:38 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 19, 2012 at 8:44 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 19, 2012 at 11:08 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 19, 2012 at 11:19 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 19, 2012 at 11:52 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Waratah - September 19, 2012 at 7:03 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 19, 2012 at 10:26 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Autumnlicious - September 19, 2012 at 5:14 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Autumnlicious - September 19, 2012 at 5:34 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 19, 2012 at 10:39 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Autumnlicious - September 19, 2012 at 11:05 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 20, 2012 at 2:53 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Reforged - September 20, 2012 at 8:06 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Jaysyn - September 20, 2012 at 10:29 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Puddleglum - September 20, 2012 at 10:32 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Shell B - September 20, 2012 at 2:23 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by zappa1258 - September 20, 2012 at 3:00 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by LastPoet - September 20, 2012 at 10:43 am
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Shell B - September 20, 2012 at 3:23 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by LastPoet - September 22, 2012 at 2:15 pm
RE: No DNA On Assange's Alleged Torn Condom - by Jaysyn - September 27, 2012 at 9:09 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Brietbart editor gets torn a new one on Bill Maher NuclearEnergy 8 3107 June 17, 2017 at 12:12 pm
Last Post: Anon2381
  FBI Arrests Ten People With Alleged Ties To Trump and Russian Mafia Secular Elf 7 2642 March 29, 2017 at 9:38 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Assange interview Napoléon 37 7171 January 11, 2017 at 10:39 am
Last Post: Aristocatt
  Julian Assange and Trump supporters Mechaghostman2 32 5655 December 16, 2016 at 3:49 pm
Last Post: CapnAwesome
  Sexual abuse 'in the DNA of Roman Church' Ziploc Surprise 10 5141 March 11, 2013 at 9:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Senator Assange? Aractus 23 7840 March 3, 2013 at 5:28 pm
Last Post: xXUKAtheistForTheTruthXx
Exclamation DNA Privacy Goes to the Supreme Court Nobody 0 1004 February 27, 2013 at 5:16 pm
Last Post: Nobody
  Senator Julian Assange? Justtristo 5 1894 December 14, 2012 at 5:41 pm
Last Post: Justtristo
  Julian Assange's speech at the Ecuadorian embassy Napoléon 31 9513 August 21, 2012 at 2:06 pm
Last Post: kılıç_mehmet



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)