RE: Professor's Proposition: Only Two Logical Choices
September 25, 2012 at 11:16 pm
(This post was last modified: September 25, 2012 at 11:18 pm by Blackrook.)
(September 25, 2012 at 10:06 pm)Darkstar Wrote:No, I have it on good authority from my father the mathematician that 1 = 1 is unproven and unprovable. This statement does not "prove itself."(September 25, 2012 at 10:02 pm)Blackrook Wrote: You can't assume based on lack of evidence that something is true, that it is untrue.
For example, it has never been proven that 1 = 1.
Mathematicians start with that as an assumption because without it, all other mathematics is impossible.
But it has never been proven that 1 = 1.
Mathematics are arbitrarily defined, and then related to the real world via arbitrarily defined measurements. 1=1 is proof of itself. Let's say proof is 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. Also, we can assume that based on a lack of evidence something is untrue. Or would you prefer guilty until proven innocent?
(September 25, 2012 at 10:23 pm)FallentoReason Wrote: @OP
Einstein wasn't a theist, so by your 'logic' the most rational stance is of the atheist, not your dad's Roman Catholic belief.
Einstein said that God does not roll dice.