(September 26, 2012 at 9:07 pm)whateverist Wrote: No, I guess I haven't make it clear enough that I see that point and agree with him as far as that goes.
No you really haven't. Up until now that's the first time I recall you saying you agree with him on any level.
Quote:Yes, I agree, that is the main point he seems to want to make.
Changed your tune a bit.
Quote: My objection is to something else I see him doing (which I've already identified), which I see as motivated and dishonest.
And as I've already pointed out, numerous times now, it doesn't make a blind bit of difference to the point which I and apparently you now agree is his main one.
Quote:For someone who purports to put a lot of stock in rationality he sure isn't above persuasion based on bluster and rhetoric. He isn't really much of an intellectual.
Are many political commentators what you consider intellectuals?
You really do have it in for this man don't you?
