Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 5, 2024, 2:28 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Intelligent design: could we do better?
#73
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better?
(October 11, 2012 at 8:27 pm)Ryantology Wrote:
(October 11, 2012 at 8:16 pm)Akincana Krishna dasa Wrote: Wait, but nature is smarter than any human.... Humans can't create the simplest living thing. Flowers aren't just "complex." They are works of art, they are beautiful. The workings of nature may be blind. Still, they are brilliant beyond human estimation.

Nature is a dumb, mechanical process. Being pretty or complex doesn't change that.

A car can be complex and beautiful, too, but that doesn't mean a car is smart.

Your analogy doesn't fit. If there's a beautiful and complex car, the car itself may be dumb. But how did the car get made? Some smart people engineered and built a car.

Maybe nature is a "dumb, mechanical process." No one can prove conclusively what it is, nor describe every aspect of its "dumb, mechanical" processes. But even assuming that that's true, the "dumb, mechanical process" of nature regularly creates things, like biological organisms, in such a way that it has thus-far baffled modern science. Modern science can't create a flower.

So why can't you respect that the processes that did create the flowers is a lot smarter than modern science?

Further, can you answer where human intelligence comes from? I assume your answer, again, will be "dumb, natural processes."
Hare Krishna Hare Krishna Krishna Krishna Hare Hare
Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Intelligent design: could we do better? - by TaraJo - October 9, 2012 at 4:32 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Kayenneh - October 9, 2012 at 4:34 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Napoléon - October 9, 2012 at 4:39 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Nine - October 9, 2012 at 4:44 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Napoléon - October 9, 2012 at 4:45 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Nine - October 9, 2012 at 4:46 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Napoléon - October 9, 2012 at 4:47 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Nine - October 9, 2012 at 4:49 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Napoléon - October 9, 2012 at 4:51 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Nine - October 9, 2012 at 4:56 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Napoléon - October 9, 2012 at 5:03 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Nine - October 9, 2012 at 5:09 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Polaris - October 13, 2012 at 10:25 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Reforged - October 9, 2012 at 4:53 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Napoléon - October 9, 2012 at 4:55 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Reforged - October 9, 2012 at 4:59 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Kayenneh - October 9, 2012 at 5:04 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Napoléon - October 9, 2012 at 5:05 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Kayenneh - October 9, 2012 at 5:07 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Reforged - October 9, 2012 at 5:10 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Godschild - October 10, 2012 at 2:07 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Napoléon - October 9, 2012 at 5:13 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Reforged - October 9, 2012 at 5:23 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Reforged - October 9, 2012 at 5:35 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by TaraJo - October 9, 2012 at 5:37 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by popeyespappy - October 10, 2012 at 12:46 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by TaraJo - October 10, 2012 at 12:59 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Haydn - October 9, 2012 at 6:10 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Reforged - October 9, 2012 at 6:24 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Haydn - October 10, 2012 at 4:43 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Justtristo - October 9, 2012 at 11:16 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Brian37 - October 10, 2012 at 7:02 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Godschild - October 10, 2012 at 3:00 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Brian37 - October 10, 2012 at 6:19 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Godschild - October 11, 2012 at 12:56 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Godschild - October 11, 2012 at 12:28 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Whateverist - October 10, 2012 at 7:44 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Whateverist - October 10, 2012 at 8:01 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Napoléon - October 10, 2012 at 3:06 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Ryantology - October 11, 2012 at 5:23 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by pocaracas - October 11, 2012 at 6:00 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Brian37 - October 10, 2012 at 7:50 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Angrboda - October 10, 2012 at 12:58 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Brian37 - October 10, 2012 at 4:14 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Angrboda - October 10, 2012 at 9:08 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Darkstar - October 10, 2012 at 8:58 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by jonb - October 10, 2012 at 9:13 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by IATIA - October 11, 2012 at 12:37 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Angrboda - October 11, 2012 at 1:08 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Darth - October 11, 2012 at 6:17 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by pocaracas - October 11, 2012 at 7:52 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by pocaracas - October 11, 2012 at 8:14 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Ryantology - October 11, 2012 at 4:14 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Ryantology - October 11, 2012 at 8:27 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Akincana Krishna dasa - October 12, 2012 at 12:06 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Darkstar - October 12, 2012 at 12:33 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Darkstar - October 12, 2012 at 12:46 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Ryantology - October 13, 2012 at 5:50 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by IATIA - October 13, 2012 at 10:53 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by jonb - October 11, 2012 at 8:15 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Whateverist - October 11, 2012 at 4:04 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Angrboda - October 12, 2012 at 6:36 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Whateverist - October 13, 2012 at 11:34 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Darkstar - October 13, 2012 at 2:49 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Godschild - October 13, 2012 at 4:13 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Nine - October 13, 2012 at 4:17 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Whateverist - October 13, 2012 at 5:19 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Godschild - October 15, 2012 at 1:31 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Nine - October 13, 2012 at 5:34 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by chi pan - October 14, 2012 at 11:34 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Darwinian - October 13, 2012 at 4:14 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by IATIA - October 14, 2012 at 11:51 am
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by chi pan - October 14, 2012 at 12:01 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by Angrboda - October 14, 2012 at 12:04 pm
RE: Intelligent design: could we do better? - by IATIA - October 14, 2012 at 1:16 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Intelligent Design Is Pseudoscience: Creationist Lies About Evolution Debunked CodeDNA 7 1226 April 22, 2023 at 6:44 pm
Last Post: no one
  The absurdity of the idea that a complex lifeform could be designed?!?! Duty 24 2294 October 7, 2021 at 4:28 am
Last Post: slartibartfast
  Are there situations where it is better to have a low IQ? Alexmahone 41 7941 July 5, 2018 at 5:41 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Blind evolution or intelligent design? ignoramus 12 2245 August 2, 2017 at 8:00 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  Glad I could clear this up for you . . . . vorlon13 3 1050 July 6, 2017 at 12:53 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  If this works it could be Huge. brewer 4 1275 April 24, 2017 at 12:44 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Do you think we could/will ever have two dominant[prime] species? Heat 11 3714 November 21, 2015 at 9:12 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  Why Do Otherwise Intelligent People Succomb to Religion? Rhondazvous 47 9342 October 25, 2015 at 8:40 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Men are better than women in combat SmootherPebble 61 18681 September 11, 2015 at 6:48 pm
Last Post: thehedglin
  Directionality in evolution without intelligent guidance tantric 25 5779 January 22, 2015 at 6:19 am
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 22 Guest(s)