(October 17, 2012 at 3:49 am)Brunitski Wrote: What things do scientists have confidence in that are "not immediately susceptible to rigorous proof" - name a few.The scientific method itself. You can't prove that science produces knowledge by the method of the scientific method itself - that would result in circular reasoning.
How do you prove that the human attempt at knowledge can produce anything really true? And further, how do you know it can produce true knowledge about the origin of life and the universe?
Hare Krishna Hare Krishna Krishna Krishna Hare Hare
Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare
Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare