An Analisis of a Premise Linking a Creator and Science

[Mortalsfool]

BETWEEN CAUSE AND EFFECT

 
 I wanted to see if my views of God’s workings had any ‘truths’ in em. I reasoned that if I am in fact getting ‘new information’, it accounts for why I never read or heard of it before. And since AI, artificial intelligence, has access to most of mankind's knowledge, I could check if my views are original, and also see if what I do propose offers rational answers to some of our most spiritually intriguing questions. AI seems to think so! What I’m learning from the Bible now, is answering all of the questions about science and the workings of the world. And the answers I get using the Bible, are presenting no conflicts with any of the sciences. And you can see in AI’s analysis, the fact that my premises, or answers, have no built-in conflicts in my proposals, this article alone contains ‘several’ unique points. It’s really hard to find something that was not talked or written about before.
Anyway, even with me being a ‘pothead’, I’ve gained a certain comfort in the fact that I’m not as crazed as I always allowed was possible. I knew I was seeing God’s works differently than what’s been written and preached about in common books.

Here’s what I attached to my article for CHAT GPT analysis:

Administrator Notice
AI deleted.  It was strongly suggested not to do this.

My original premise can be posted after this

[Nay_Sayer]

Christian science isn't science.

Carry on.

Thoughts and prayers RAmen

[brewer]

Getting stroked by AI, how wonderful for you.

[Angrboda]

GIGO.

[Ravenshire]

Despite what your AI ego rub made you think, there's nothing original in any of your points. It's all been thought, said, and posted here before you ever thought of visiting.

[Angrboda]