(October 29, 2012 at 3:43 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote:I often find when looking at a problem, it can be quite illuminating to try to look at it from a different angle, and to look for similar situations.(October 26, 2012 at 8:25 pm)jonb Wrote: What on earth are you going on about?
Didn't you like me saying that bias is more general than just what is happening in academic science, and giving two examples of it?
No, I didn't like your conflation of the activities of a privately held organization (of which serves an audience that clearly endorses various -isms) and the larger, unrelated issue of women in the sciences.
Your conflation and confusion of disparate issues muddies up the primary topic.
(October 29, 2012 at 3:43 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote: Show me something other than a study that screams "bias!" with some meaningful conclusions (as to how and why) than simply using said study and implying that the males are simply sexist.Actually that is not my position at all, I think there are all sorts of variables, which affect how groups of people are perceived, which then has implications for individuals in that group. And I would add the person with such a bias is often not even be aware of it. Just encase here is another study on impartiality-
http://www.nber.org/papers/w5903
(October 29, 2012 at 3:43 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote: I didn't apologize. Fuck you.
I am taken aback, at your unexpected and kind offer of sexual congress, but due to prior engagements I am afraid I will not be able to join with you, please do not take this personally. You should not take this rejection, as being because of anything to do with your person, I am sure you are a fine individual, and you will find the right person for you one day.
Love and kisses Jonb
