RE: Do to really believe a snake talked?!
November 9, 2012 at 6:55 pm
(This post was last modified: November 9, 2012 at 6:56 pm by pocaracas.)
(November 9, 2012 at 1:39 pm)John V Wrote:(November 9, 2012 at 12:11 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Another speculation could be:I don't believe you can have two singularites in the same space by definition.
- Eternal multiple singularities, when two collide (whatever that means), a big bang is generated.
Quote:- The singularity was always there, brooding, or something beyond our physics (as yet) until it poped.These are appeals to the supernatural, which atheists typically frown on.
- singularities are generated from other processes beyond our physics.
SINGULARITY:
![[Image: 15767532.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.memegenerator.net%2Finstances%2F400x%2F15767532.jpg)
To put it simply, a singularity is a single point (dimensionless, no width, height, length nor time span) in space where the known laws of physics break down and aren't applicable.
At the moment, any speculation can be put into a singularity, even god, and all we can say about it is: we don't know... maybe that speculative hypothesis is right, maybe not.
Out of the astonishing number of different possible hypotheses, god is but one. The odds of finding god in there are then miniscule.
This is not something I believe in, it's just what it is.
Because of this miniscule probability, the natural assumption is that god should not be the answer.
Let's work into finding it and getting some certainties. Until then, we hold our money and refrain from betting on any horse.
This is the atheistic perspective.
The theistic perspective is: I bet on this horse because I believe he'll win in the end.
All horses are equally unlikely to win, but you just put all your money on that one.
Does this behavior make sense? not to me...