(November 21, 2012 at 6:38 am)Daniel Wrote: Zen, I haven't looked into this case, hence I didn't comment on it. How is Child Porn any worse than the extreme violent gonzo porn that the USA makes? Specifically how is it worse than Rob Black depicting rape, torture, pain, humiliation and suffering in porn?
She wanted to film an underage teenage girl having sex? I know Child Porn is highly stigmatized, but again - big deal, how is it actually any worse than the most extreme "mainstream" gonzo pornography that is filmed in the USA anyway? All she was going to give the world is another piece of exploitative pornography.
Yeah we get it, she's as evil as hitler because she's producing child porn. Why don't you guys take your lead from Denmark and try cleaning up the garbage presently "legally" produced and spewed out to the world? Do we really need rape, torture, pain and suffering depicted in pornography??
Do you even understand why Child Pornography is reviled? Because the children who participate in it are the victims. That's what makes it a big deal. We actually have no problem with actors above legal age participating in pornography even if they look really, really young.
Incidentally, what is everyone's opinion cartoon or animated pornographic depiction of children - such as lolicon or shotacon? Personally, I'd consider them as weird and creepy as any other depiction of rape or BDSM, but I think they should be legal because they are, ultimately, victimless.
