(November 22, 2012 at 6:34 am)LastPoet Wrote: Really? You don't undertand that the 'material' paedo's watch, had to come from victimizing a child? How odd that you in your vaunted intelligence can't see that.It didn't, it came from Denmark and was produced LEGALLY! Stop telling me that it depicts a CRIME because if it did it wouldn't have been produced LEGALLY. All your doing is calling it out for the stigma you have of it. Yes it's awful, but you can't hide behind the "victim" argument if both parties in a sex act are 12 years old can you? Which of them is the victim then? What about when they're both 17?
Until 1980 Denmark didn't draw a line in the sand as to how old someone had to be in pornography, as of 1980 they now have to be 18 years old or older (same as most of the world now). Now you can put it down to ignorance and inexperience (how could they have known in 1969 the ramifications of totally legalizing pornography without any restrictions?) But claiming the victim argument is you taking the "moral high ground" on this issue.
We're not talking about the material that paedophiles produce depicting acts with their victims, we're talking about Denmark, they started the problem of child porn, their material has been digitally scanned and distributed now for 40+ years. It was a booming industry, you'll unfortunately never be able to destroy what it created.
Presently the USA is doing what Denmark did, producing highly offensive sexual material. Beastiality is less offensive then what the USA is producing these days. They're giving the whole world the problem, just like Denmark gave the whole world the problem of child porn. Until they made it it didn't exist, same thing with the USA and extreme BDSM.
