(October 6, 2009 at 5:43 pm)Rhizomorph13 Wrote: Void,
You got it pretty much but we are just niggling over definitions which is fine because my idea is simply a thought experiment that isn't backed up by math or anything. I think of the three dimensions as space with tz being duration and then two dimensions to account for choice tx and tz. So maybe one for intelligent choices and one for naturalistic potentials? admittedly there probably isn't a great need for the ty other than the ease of the concept of perceiving from a six dimensional perspective with the three physical dimensions being perceived as points. By slice I meant this moment as expressed by an infinite plane tx by ty.
Rhizo
So?:
tz = Flow of time
tx = Choices
ty = Redundant
One thing, why do you think naturalistic and intelligent choices would posit any different status in time? What inside time knows the difference? And what is the difference between naturalistic and intelligent choices when intelligence is a product of a naturalistic device (brain) and choices come into effect through the body?
Also, TX would not be time anyway, it would be the higher dimension, a plane with multiple 4 dimensional bubbles.
You're stepping into your dualism again Rhizo, like the soul thing, you're making unsupported assumptions and then devising a framework around a presupposition...
.