(October 6, 2009 at 7:06 pm)Rhizomorph13 Wrote:(October 6, 2009 at 6:08 pm)theVOID Wrote: One thing, why do you think naturalistic and intelligent choices would posit any different status in time? What inside time knows the difference? And what is the difference between naturalistic and intelligent choices when intelligence is a product of a naturalistic device (brain) and choices come into effect through the body?
Good point, but there is a 10 dimensional model so my 5 or six dimensions doesn't jive with science much better than a three or four dimensional model.
But 3 dimensional time doesn't jive at all.
Quote:Quote:Also, TX would not be time anyway, it would be the higher dimension, a plane with multiple 4 dimensional bubbles.
A dimension is only ever a line, never a plane. A plane is two dimensions, by definition, in geometry.
Alone it is a single line, but in total it is 5 dimensional geometry (plane was the wrong word i admit)
Quote:You're stepping into your dualism again Rhizo, like the soul thing, you're making unsupported assumptions and then devising a framework around a presupposition...
This statement is an ad hominem attack that fails to strengthen your case. My six dimensional model of the universe has nothing to do with dualism or a soul. Keep in mind that you are just making assumptions as well. I haven't seen any links to peer-reviewed studies or anything. Come on Void play nice.
![Smile Smile](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Thanks,
Rhizo
[/quote]
Ah hominem this ad hominem that, really, i don't give a fuck what label you have to apply to it, it was just a comment. I got the impression you were getting into dualism, that's all, if i'm wrong sweet i have no problem with that. I know you aren't trying to describe reality, i'm just trying to explain why the 3-dimensional time idea is nonsensical.
.