Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 22, 2025, 3:45 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Are we all just part of a computer simulation? Scientists are trying to find that out.
#14
RE: Are we all just part of a computer simulation? Scientists are trying to find that out.
(December 15, 2012 at 11:13 am)TaraJo Wrote: http://www.inquisitr.com/437451/our-univ...ew-theory/

Interesting article. Thanks.

I read an interesting thought experiment earlier this year which considered the morality of computer game designers incorporating into their games, if they could, an advanced artificial intelligence such as would make the characters truly sentient.

It was none-too-subtle analogy to God giving human beings sentient awareness of pain. IE. Should the game designer incorporate that program into the game He created? The counter-apologist Op claimed that, (unlike God) the consensus of most human game designers is ''that the designer ought not to incorporate that program - that to do so would to be doing something wrong. The underlying intuition is that to introduce the ability to suffer is wrong.''

The thought experiment is supposed to help lead the mind to the conclusion that;

- since most human game designers arguably would not inflict AI pain awareness (sentience) on Sonic the Hedgehog or car crash victims in Grand Theft Auto because that is immoral,

and/

- the games themselves can be enjoyed by the game users as intended, as they are without the need for the existence of any AI sentience of real suffering by the game characters, so God/game programmer wouldnt include redundant suffering,

and/

- unlike programmed games, the real world has actual human sentient experience of pain,

Therefore - The pain sentience of characters in real life must have derived from some other explanation - an impersonal cause - NOT a deliberate program designer. (AKA - teleology.)


Of course it overlooks heaps of other theodicy arguments answering the so-called problem of pain, but otherwise it sounds persuasive, right?

WRONG.

Heres why. Are we really supposed to believe that game ''sentience'' programmers wouldnt be lining up to claim a Nobel Prize for this breakthrough in "artificial intelligence"?

If creating ''characters'' with the sentient ability to feel pain is immoral, why do we willingly take part in the game called parenthood?

[Image: family%202_r2_c2.jpg]
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Are we all just part of a computer simulation? Scientists are trying to find that out. - by Lion IRC - December 16, 2012 at 8:46 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Can you prove a negative, part 2 Fake Messiah 7 2291 May 30, 2025 at 9:41 pm
Last Post: Paleophyte
  Metaethics Part 1: Cognitivism/Non-cognitivism Disagreeable 24 4121 February 11, 2022 at 6:46 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  What would you do if you found out we are all in a sim? ignoramus 46 8265 October 9, 2017 at 8:25 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  What do scientists say about existence? Mariosep 186 67737 July 20, 2017 at 10:59 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  What if the government was run by scientists? WisdomOfTheTrees 63 14896 February 21, 2017 at 8:43 pm
Last Post: KUSA
  Trying to simplify my Consciousness hypothesis Won2blv 83 22450 February 21, 2017 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Proof we Live in a Simulation AFTT47 25 8380 March 7, 2015 at 9:19 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Photons and determinism, part 2 bennyboy 87 26804 March 3, 2015 at 12:34 am
Last Post: Surgenator
  Uploading Conciousness to Computer AFTT47 26 10682 January 29, 2015 at 3:50 pm
Last Post: Faith No More
  Trying to Understand Many-Worlds Interpretation Better GrandizerII 45 10588 November 29, 2014 at 5:05 pm
Last Post: Alex K



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)