Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 19, 2025, 4:48 am
Atheist Forums › Community › Religion › Christianity v
Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark
pocaracas Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Religious Views: Non-believer
Posts: 19668
Threads: 178
Joined: July 31, 2012
Reputation: 91
#10
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark
December 19, 2012 at 10:39 am
(December 19, 2012 at 8:52 am)Brian37 Wrote: A person back then wrote some shit, probably believed it, copied the ideas from other writers, added and subtracted shit, and successfully marketed it.

Ultimately there was no magic baby or magical death. There were people who wrote shit and sold it because they wanted it to be true.
Note: the people who wrote the thing may not have been the same who marketed it.
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Religion › Christianity v
Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark

Messages In This Thread
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Aractus - December 22, 2012 at 10:14 pm
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Cyberman - December 18, 2012 at 10:52 pm
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Aractus - December 19, 2012 at 3:53 am
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Aractus - December 19, 2012 at 5:15 am
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Brian37 - December 19, 2012 at 8:52 am
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by pocaracas - December 19, 2012 at 10:39 am
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Aractus - December 20, 2012 at 3:23 am
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Brian37 - December 22, 2012 at 7:59 am
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Brian37 - December 19, 2012 at 3:32 pm
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Brian37 - December 19, 2012 at 5:15 pm
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Brian37 - December 19, 2012 at 6:05 pm
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Aractus - December 20, 2012 at 4:45 am
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Aractus - December 20, 2012 at 7:17 am
RE: Compositional anaylsis of the Gospel of Mark - by Aractus - December 21, 2012 at 2:33 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Gospel of John controversy Jillybean 13 3078 June 12, 2024 at 10:54 pm
Last Post: Prycejosh1987
  Mark's Gospel was damaged and reassembled incorrectly SeniorCitizen 1 766 November 19, 2023 at 5:48 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Embellishments in the Gospel of Mark. Jehanne 133 23470 May 7, 2019 at 9:50 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  How can you prove that the gospel of Mark is not the "word of god"? Lincoln05 100 18827 October 16, 2018 at 5:38 pm
Last Post: GrandizerII
  The Gospel of Peter versus the Gospel of Matthew. Jehanne 47 9848 July 14, 2018 at 12:22 am
Last Post: Godscreated
  The Anonymous Gospel Manuscripts athrock 127 33442 February 9, 2016 at 1:46 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles = Satanic Gospel Metis 14 5451 July 17, 2015 at 12:16 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  Why do gospel contradictions matter? taylor93112 87 25445 April 28, 2015 at 7:27 pm
Last Post: Desert Diva
  The infancy gospel of thomas dyresand 18 9068 December 29, 2014 at 10:35 am
Last Post: dyresand
  "Gospel Quest" (or The Jesus Timeline) DeistPaladin 93 23393 August 11, 2014 at 5:40 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)