(January 1, 2013 at 1:19 pm)Welsh cake Wrote: I don't even think Mark has any burden of proof anymore because the claim he's making is so vague and meaningless, it can simply be dismissed as incoherent in an epistemological dispute.
Saying you believe in 'god', is as senseless as saying you believe in 'X'. No one's going to know what the hell you are babbling on about until you define 'X'
That's true of course. I have never known what was meant by gods. Whatever they may be I suppose those that worship them are entitled to have it their way. Just don't sign us all up for any group plan. If I ever go in for something delusional it'll probably be some man/beast like a centaur or sexy mermaid babe.
