RE: Athiesm is a Faith?
January 1, 2013 at 9:46 pm
(This post was last modified: January 1, 2013 at 9:47 pm by Mark 13:13.)
(January 1, 2013 at 8:54 pm)Stimbo Wrote:(January 1, 2013 at 8:42 pm)Mark 13:13 Wrote: I have been very clear about this proof question upto now, I have admitted and accepted that I can provide NO proof. And given the length of the discussion over eons of time it would be incredably improbable that I would come up with a new one you haven't come across before. I have made it clear that I see no more burden of proof in me Saying I believe in God or you saying you don't. But likewise for all the bluster and fancy word play. No one on this forum can provide any Proof that God does not exist. We both know the proof question is a dead end.
Here's why this is totally wrong, in cartoon form:
I know I and others have put this up before, but if this isn't the perfect time and place then there isn't one.
Yes its perfect timing, and I accept the many points made but I hold my position that because the God I believe in can never be proved or disproved by science EVER because He does not exist anywhere science can search or even have the tools to search. It cannot be proved or disproved. God is not like any other phenomenon that science can explore and the acceptance of a belief or not in God does not in itself hamper science from progression or making definative statements about what it is equiped to deal with. I do not try to shift the burden of proof rather i contend that in this situation there is no burden of proof on either party unless one party sets out to prove to the other that are wrong. I do not set out to prove you are wrong so no burden accepted.
