If you only knew what it makes you sound like when you assume we hold our positions because they are convenient to our arguments instead of because we have a consensus that we should follow the rules of logic wherever they take us, you'd stop the craven insinuations.
I still hesitate to conclude that you can't be reached on this matter, though: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophic...n_of_proof
If you don't have evidence or an argument that you think justifies your belief in God, what sort of conversation on the matter do you think is possible?
I still hesitate to conclude that you can't be reached on this matter, though: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophic...n_of_proof
If you don't have evidence or an argument that you think justifies your belief in God, what sort of conversation on the matter do you think is possible?
