Re: RE: The logical consequences of omnipotence
January 20, 2013 at 1:48 am
(This post was last modified: January 20, 2013 at 2:02 am by fr0d0.)
(January 20, 2013 at 12:52 am)Esquilax Wrote: I don't give much of a shit as to whether or not you believe my definition is applicable or not.
And there we have it. You don't care if your statement is inaccurate. Kind of sums up all atheist objections I've ever seen. Consequently worthless opinion.
Get back to me when you're interested. Until then... enjoy your fantasy
![Wink Wink](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/wink.gif)
To repeat: I have made no claim. You have. I called you out on it. All you can do is try to deflect.
Let me repeat it for you: you claim that omnipotence, when applied to the Christian God, should be able to construct any illogical reality you pick out of the air. On the strength of that, you call the present working and logical reality flawed. (Yes, if you call God flawed, you also call this reality flawed, because that is what God represents)
You propose an un crashable aeroplane thinking that you don't have to show any logic to prove your claim. Then you scoff at the scientific community who shun you.
Unfortunately for you, Christianity rests on what is to you unfathomable logic. Undefeatable logic > proven.