(January 20, 2013 at 3:42 pm)Joy Squeezy Wrote: Actually the 'thread' was only a link, which is a lazy cop-out as far as I'm concerned. I don't respond to links. There is also a comment that comes up if a thread hasn't been commented on for more than a specified time, which suggests starting a new thread.
Sure, but I think a mod asked you if you would move over to the other thread. Also if you have read the thread maybe what you wanted to cover had already been discussed.
(January 20, 2013 at 3:42 pm)Joy Squeezy Wrote: This is clearly a cliquey little in-group of people who belong in a chatroom, not a site that purports to be an 'atheist forum'.
Your more than welcome to join the clique

We has lots of atheists on a forum. I think it fits the requirements of an atheist forum.
(January 20, 2013 at 3:42 pm)Joy Squeezy Wrote: If a certain self-proclaimed 'highly spiritual', yet confusingly popular poster who appears to have no life except on here would shut up for once, I'm sure the forum would improve about 60 per cent.
I doubt that. Were would the fun be?
(January 20, 2013 at 3:42 pm)Joy Squeezy Wrote: That's not likely to happen. I get paid to write in the 'real' world. I also have a friend who writes brilliantly on a multitude of topics and has degrees in both physics and law who wanted to write on here too,
Thats nice.
(January 20, 2013 at 3:42 pm)Joy Squeezy Wrote: but all the juvenile crap put him off.
Meh, maybe you should both actually look around. This entire time there's been several ongoing debates on here. You seem to be attracted to the threads where people are being casual.
(January 20, 2013 at 3:42 pm)Joy Squeezy Wrote: Clearly this 'chatroom' isn't for me, and it's obvious you don't welcome outsiders.
I guess its not for you but plenty of people join all the time.