Another law thread

[Drich]

Please rephrase your eforts to fit the model FSM provided in...

FMS?

What? You aren't even trying to contact our Noodly Savior!?!

If someone tell you to meet them at the libary at 2:30 and you decide to wait for them at Mcdonalds at 3:00 Is it a resonable to expect to see them at McDonalds at 3:00? Further more is it their fault because you can not follow instructions.

Do you want to go to hell? What do you mean "he doesn't answer", just try harder!

Again, it is not about trying harder. It is about following simply instructions. If you are not expected to Follow the directions of the God of the Universe, then why is it you expect the God of all Creation to do what you expect? Again who are you to will your authority over another man let alone the Lord of Creation.

What do you mean "I've been trying for years"? Try for more years!
If it doesn't work in your lifetime, you'll definitely know when you're dead!

In EVERY single instance of people 'trying' to reach out to God their own admitted efforts did not follow what was laid out by Christ himself in Luke 11. Granted what I hear often times follows the doctrine of a major denomination of Christianity, but in the end still does not follow what the bible tells us.

So again if God tells you to do A and you do it your way instead or the catholic way or the Baptist way, instead of doing "A" as God instructed. Is God to blame?

---

Why do you assume that "this is a guide on how to live your life?"

I'm not assuming anything because after I asked two questions I guaranteed that I was not creating a false dichotomy or false dilemma because I also then including the options of "neither" and "both" and asked for a possible elaboration.

Well, let's see exactly what you wrote:

I have a question... is the purpose of all this more logical or more as a guide of how to live your life.... or neither of those purposes or both of those purposes equally?

Here is the fallacy in the question you "asked."

You ASSUME that one seeks Logic or that one seeks a guide as to how to live one's life. Even in your catch all statement "Neither or both" You are still supposing that the Bible or Christianity is still the means one seeks "Logically or as a guide" to live one's life. I simply asked why do you assume That (any of the above) has anything to do with how one lives his/her life?

In order to give you a proper elaberation of the neither option. we must first established that christianity/the bible is not a guide to live one's life. For the resulting life one lives as a Christian is a secondary by-product of the true nature of Christianity. Ironically those who seek to live their lives by christianity's rules will most likly find themselves on the outside looking in, or so says Christ and the Apstoles.

so inorder to move forward you must conceed the idea that Biblical Christianity is about how to live one's life. and simply ask the question you are looking to get answered.