No, I don't have "faith" in anything. Stimulus, in terms of sight, means the presence of light reflecting off of objects and into the eye. I do not take it on faitht hat there is light present when I see things, I use my other senses at the same time to determine whether what I'm seeing is accurate.
For instance, one time some years ago, my car lit on fire. I looked at the car, and I saw blackness leeching across the paintwork, which alone would be evidence of fire, but I couldn't see the fire. Instead of opening the hood to see if there was fire, which would have been bad since the fire would have been exposed to air and hit me int he face, I heard the sounds of fire, could smell plastic and metal melting, and could feel the heat coming from the car.
I didn't take it on faith that thew car was on fire just because what I saw wasn't conclusive, you see what I mean? Truth is determined in science by multiple points of evidence converging on the same answer.
But anyway, did you have a point this was leading to?
For instance, one time some years ago, my car lit on fire. I looked at the car, and I saw blackness leeching across the paintwork, which alone would be evidence of fire, but I couldn't see the fire. Instead of opening the hood to see if there was fire, which would have been bad since the fire would have been exposed to air and hit me int he face, I heard the sounds of fire, could smell plastic and metal melting, and could feel the heat coming from the car.
I didn't take it on faith that thew car was on fire just because what I saw wasn't conclusive, you see what I mean? Truth is determined in science by multiple points of evidence converging on the same answer.
But anyway, did you have a point this was leading to?
