RE: Man quits job over bad woo
February 8, 2013 at 6:01 pm
(This post was last modified: February 8, 2013 at 6:09 pm by Violet.)
(February 8, 2013 at 5:50 pm)John V Wrote: Sorry sweety, you're overlooking the two X chromosomes factor, which comes before "normally." I've been including chromosomes in some of the posts ya know.
Oh, I noticed that too, but my concern was defining womanhood as 'the possession of vagina'
I have a separate response to the 2 X chromosome = woman factor as well:
These are women.
No doubt, then you might say women have to be human... and then I'll bring out a shit ton of nonhuman characters who are women... then maybe you'll argue that they have to be 'IRL!', then I might respond with human women who've had their ovaries removed, and then we might realize that having access to our reproductive functions is a wash and that we'd still call those women women because they are women, but by definition cannot be women, so what's the point?
Quote:Come to think of it, some men irreverently define a woman as a life support system for a vagina. hock:
Not me.
I think the other parts are nice too.
I think I'd have to agree with you... and who needs a life-support system for a vagina when you've got your fleshlight or your hand? ^_^
Without the attached woman... vaginas are really meh. Penises too, if the woman has one. Really, without that cute face and adorable cries: what is sex worth?
... What have I done?
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day