RE: Man quits job over bad woo
February 9, 2013 at 10:22 am
(This post was last modified: February 9, 2013 at 10:50 am by justin.)
(February 8, 2013 at 2:04 pm)John V Wrote:(February 8, 2013 at 1:50 pm)LastPoet Wrote: I will gently explain this to you: ad hominem, when you use a [perceived] character flaw to attack the messenger and not the message.Incorrect, as there is no original message to attack. TJ attacked the guy in the clip. I attacked TJ.
No you attacked someone based on sexuality and gender and while you may not be comfortable with it( implied from above comment obviously) that doesn't mean it is a life with less value and should be criticized because of your ignorance. The man in the report is causing a fuss over irrational belief that the numbers 666 have bad mojo and because of this belief expects his employers to bend to his fucking need instead of Being mature and grow out of childish myths. Attacking tj because of how he/she expresses his/her (not sure to be honest) sexuality is irrational. Now stop saying stupid shit. Maybe be grown and apologize but somehow i i don't think that's gonna happen.
