Legislation for gay marriage is approved in the UK House of Commons!

[A Theist]

---

No way do I believe that a gay relationship is a natural and normal thing. It's all nonsense! Our bodies are not constructed to accommodate same gender sex. I don't buy into gay marriage either. Gay marriage is a perversion, a distortion of real marriage, between one man and one woman. Britain has finally succumbed to the bullying and intimidation by gay and leftwing activists. I only hope that the people here in the U.S. will stand their ground to oppose gay marriage.

---

Some honest questions:

1) How are you defining the words "natural" and "normal"? For instance, if it were proved that being gay is natural (i.e. not a "lifestyle choice" as a lot of anti-gay people claim), would you accept gay relationships, or are you basing what is "natural" on something else?

I'm basing 'natural' and 'normal' in this instance on the physical anatomy. God / nature / evolution, your preference, did not equip our bodies for same gender sex. I.E., the rectum is not designed for anal sex or to receive foreign objects. Continued 'rectal sexual trauma' can lead to various colo-rectal diseases and conditions like prolapse, infections, bowel perforations, and in more extreme cases, rectal cancer. On the otherhand, nature has provided our bodies with the proper and natural organs for male / female sex...male / female sex is natural and normal. Gay and lesbian sex is not....The link below isn't critical of the gay / lesbian lifestyle, but it does give some insights to health issues pertaining to unnatural gay sex....
http://www.nursingtimes.net/management-o...50.article

2) If someone loses their genitals, their bodies are no longer constructed to accommodate any form of sex. Does that mean they are unable to have a relationship with someone in your eyes? My point being, do you see relationships as purely about sex, or do you admit that people can have relationships without sex being a factor or even a necessity? There are, for example, many straight asexual couples who have no interest in sex whatsoever, but their relationships are based on spending time with each other.

If you're talking about some guys getting together for a few beers over the weekend to watch the big game, for example, no. There's nothing wrong with that. I also believe that people can still be friends and have relationships and bonds despite their deep and striking differences in opinions. All I'm saying is that gay / lesbian sex is neither natural or normal...

3) Who/what do you think controls what "real marriage" is?

I imagine that it would have always been a cultural thing...A rational thinking culture would realize that gay / lesbian sex and relationships are unnatural and would rather legitimize the natural relationship between a man and a woman.

4) Marriage was at one point, in your own country, defined as between one man and one woman of the same race. Was that also a perversion of real marriage? Do you accept that the definition of marriage has changed over the years?

Interracial marriage between a man and a woman can't be considered a perversion of real marriage. Both the male and female are anatomically correct for each other and they can produce off-spring. Let gays and lesbians do that one. The definition of marriage hasn't changed for everybody...If there were more of a debate about this issue I believe a lot more people would decide against gay marriage.

Oh, and FYI, the people who brought this bill to parliament were conservatives.

There's conservatives in Great Britain?

---

---

Conversations get pretty boring when everyone agrees, don't they? Okay, so here goes...
No way do I believe that a gay relationship is a natural and normal thing. It's all nonsense! Our bodies are not constructed to accommodate same gender sex.

---

Dick and ass. Mouth and dick. Hand and pussy. Mouth and pussy. Seems like our bodies can accommodate for same-sex relations just fine.

Penis and Vagina is natural. But gays and lesbians have to resort to anal sex and masturbation because nature doesn't provide them with the organs for same gender sex.