(February 15, 2013 at 1:55 pm)Brian37 Wrote:Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote:My utterance of a thing proves its vocal existence.
But not it's literal existence. Otherwise my "Snarfwidget" is real merely because I typed the word "Snarfwidget".
... You did say 'utter', did you not?
* Violet looks in dictionary.
Was what you said related to legality?
![Thinking Thinking](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/thinking.gif)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk
Literary existence is quite apart from vocality unless tis a phonetical issue. Further, yes: Snarfwidgets are real *exactly* because you typed the word. They can really be nothing, but their reality is, regardless of how it is constituted.
Quote:Which proves humans make toys, nothing more.
You do know what "anthropomorphism" is?
Humans are gods? Fascinating concept.
Isn't that the egotistical term humans use when they think to apply parts of them to other things? Funny... you'd think that the creators had maybe created humans in their image, but nooo.... those humans have to go and personalize that shit.
![Heart Heart](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/heart.gif)
Ahhh, it's why I love them so much. That, and some of them are *really* sexy... it's like they never wondered about the hair length on the top of their heads (do you see any other primates with that? You're special fap material, oh yes you are~. THEY ARE SO ADORABLE!).
![[Image: yaoi-yaoi-demotivational-poster-1215374144.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i1171.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fr560%2Fkris_best%2Fyaoi-yaoi-demotivational-poster-1215374144.jpg)
I was behind sexual development on this planet... I'm sorry if you don't like it: I was a little biased in making it. Lots of bugs with it though
![Undecided Undecided](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/undecided.gif)
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day