One of many things that have puzzled me over the many moons and stars be the one so close above.
(Had to add a touch of poetry)
What gets me a thinking is why would an all perfect non-temporal being have any need for an image? What would be the point if those who bare the gift of sight cannot witness the reflection of light from an image of might?
Being non-temporal means being beyond the phyical such as an image. So why bare an image?
What purpose would an image have for an all perfect god if he requires none and is beyond it?
Many questions I see.
Ok I'm done with da poetry thing.
Seriously though, I see no point to why god would have a physical image.
(Had to add a touch of poetry)
What gets me a thinking is why would an all perfect non-temporal being have any need for an image? What would be the point if those who bare the gift of sight cannot witness the reflection of light from an image of might?
Being non-temporal means being beyond the phyical such as an image. So why bare an image?
What purpose would an image have for an all perfect god if he requires none and is beyond it?
Many questions I see.Ok I'm done with da poetry thing.
Seriously though, I see no point to why god would have a physical image.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
