Brian,
If there is anything left of you that might be labeled reasonable; consider this:
Science allows me to build and deploy a nuclear weapon anywhere I want. Science also informs me in great detail, without the need for demonstration, what the consequences of delivery and detonation would be. Science will inform my decision to use the weapon or not, but science is fuck all capable of making the decision for me. To make the decision, I need philosophy.
You proclaim to hate the word 'philosophy', ignoring the fact that you use philosophy at least in the sense of assigning value in order to make this claim. Rather amusing. Doubt my reasoning? What makes you find some words acceptable, but 'hate' the word philosophy? Can you use science to answer this question?
If there is anything left of you that might be labeled reasonable; consider this:
Science allows me to build and deploy a nuclear weapon anywhere I want. Science also informs me in great detail, without the need for demonstration, what the consequences of delivery and detonation would be. Science will inform my decision to use the weapon or not, but science is fuck all capable of making the decision for me. To make the decision, I need philosophy.
You proclaim to hate the word 'philosophy', ignoring the fact that you use philosophy at least in the sense of assigning value in order to make this claim. Rather amusing. Doubt my reasoning? What makes you find some words acceptable, but 'hate' the word philosophy? Can you use science to answer this question?