(February 18, 2013 at 6:25 pm)Confused Ape Wrote:(February 18, 2013 at 5:23 pm)ThomM Wrote: However - if the early mentions of the christ were to be significant - why do they not mention his miraculous rising from the dead ? Maybe that was NOT made up to be part of the MYTH yet?
Pagan Roman historians weren't interested in writing books about Christian beliefs because they regarded Christianity as superstitious nonsense.
-------
And you see - that IS THE POINT
IF there was a christ and he actually rose from the dead - that would have been reported by someone
THAT it was not is because is was NONSENSE and had NO support in fact.
Still doesn't