RE: If homosexuality were preventable should it be prevented?
February 27, 2013 at 9:13 am
(This post was last modified: February 27, 2013 at 9:20 am by earmuffs.)
(February 27, 2013 at 5:11 am)Aractus Wrote: Well they should be prevented from marrying, and prevented from adopting children, so I suppose prevented from existence makes perfect sense.
So do you plan on defending your ignorant opinion or are you happy to just appear as a complete fucktard?
Here's an alternative question.
If there was a magic pill that meant you take it and your baby would come out white, no matter the skin colour of the parents, Asian, African, African American, Latino, etc.. this pill made all babies come out as little blonde haired, blue eyed, western looking babies.
Should people take this pill?
Here's another question.
Why is homosexuality in this case considered the trait that needs to "bred out"?
Why not a pill to prevent hetrosexuality? What makes hetrosexuality superior to homosexuality?
Babies? With technology we can artificially impregnate people. Surrogates. Certainly enough orphans in the world..
It's natural? Over 700 animal speciies exzibit homosexual activity...