RE: If homosexuality were preventable should it be prevented?
February 27, 2013 at 10:19 pm
(This post was last modified: February 27, 2013 at 10:22 pm by paulpablo.)
I'm sure some people would volunteer to change their sexuality because you know, if there's something that can be done that's weird someone somewhere is going to do it, but i think its fairly obvious the general rule is people are gay because they like being gay and straight because they like being straight so barely anyone would volunteer to change.
Transexual isn't a sexuality, also in the context of this proposed situation where people are volunteering to become homosexuals to prevent population overflow becoming pan sexual or bi sexual wouldn't have much benefit.
(February 27, 2013 at 9:50 pm)Question Mark Wrote:(February 27, 2013 at 9:44 pm)Nobody Wrote: It would be an interesting take to see how many people who are all for homosexual rights, volunteer to become homosexuals.
Or bisexual? Pansexual? Transexual?
If it were made a choice, why not go broad? Why not be cured one way and then back the other way? It's an interesting prospect when it actually is a choice
Transexual isn't a sexuality, also in the context of this proposed situation where people are volunteering to become homosexuals to prevent population overflow becoming pan sexual or bi sexual wouldn't have much benefit.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.
