After reading that article, I fail to see how you made a functioning artificial brain.
All that article says is that the artificial brain that IBM made (and didn't work) was completely wrong, based on wrong premisses and could never ever work.
How did you make the leap from that to those idiocies that you wrote here?
All that article says is that the artificial brain that IBM made (and didn't work) was completely wrong, based on wrong premisses and could never ever work.
How did you make the leap from that to those idiocies that you wrote here?