(March 1, 2013 at 12:17 pm)Gabriel Syme Wrote: Ther would also be wider social benefits - HIV would essentially disappear in the west, for a start. (In western society, the disease affects gay men almost exclusively).
Would you care to provide evidence for this baseless assertion? Statistics in favour of nonsense like this hasn't been around since the 80's so far as I'm aware. HIV being a "gay disease" has been proven a myth by about every respectable medical institution. Google it.
Quote:Not all, but many gay people I encounter on forums, websites generally, the media etc seem to be in a constant state of anger about something or other. Often it is because someone has aired a different opinion to theirs, especially if it is about gay "marriage" or "gay families". I dont think its healthy or constructive to be constantly angry.
Like on Fox news, for instance?
It's hard to be happy when there's a large percentage of the population who'd sooner spit on you than shake your hand. If people would simply extend common courtesy instead of conjuring up social circumstances that come about because of the hate directed against them as reasons for them not to exist, there would be no problem.
Quote:I do not regard this opinion as being controversial, not even slightly. Many babies are aborted because of tiny imperfections, (and ones which can be fixed medically), such as a cleft-pallette or haired-lip.
Judging by this, I certainly think some people would abort, if they could prove their unborn child would turn out gay, so obviously many people would choose to prevent homosexuality occuring if they could.
I don't want to put words in your mouth, but are you saying that gay babies should be aborted? That is beyond bigotry, that's genocide.
If you believe it, question it. If you question it, get an answer. If you have an answer, does that answer satisfy reality? Does it satisfy you? Probably not. For no one else will agree with you, not really.
