RE: The difference between ethical atheism and nihlism is that ethical atheists have more faith
March 1, 2013 at 7:55 pm
(March 1, 2013 at 3:00 pm)jstrodel Wrote: If naturalism is true e.g. there is no God and the material universe, more or less, is all that exists, the naturalist is faced with two possible stances:
BLAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLA BLAAAA BLÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ BLÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖ BLÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜÜ qerpfiheqrbgfßeüiqbrgpikjb2erüibhüqpbifr pwbfeq1h´+ihfon13kjadndf#äqerökgj qjbcqö blaBLA BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA bläblablöblablablänlaaa BLAAAAAAAAAA
YES exactly. Everything you wrote here isnt worth a damn. Let alone worth reading, right after the moment you used the sentence "If naturalism is true". Thereby taking the possition of being the high judge on what certain mindest are and determening what their consequences can only be. I might have problems expressing it in the english language but in german we call it "hochnäsig" or maybe even "totaler Wahrheitsanspruch" or even "Halbwissen" which could translate to "asserting to know everything about something whilest one actualy knows nothing about the subject one is talking about".
I think in english one uses the term "mental masturbation" which is used here only by bavarian comedians "geistige masturbation"
