The difference between computing and science.
February 25, 2022 at 11:54 am
(This post was last modified: February 25, 2022 at 12:25 pm by highdimensionman.)
With science all people tend to want to do is understand the reality better which might yield better computer technology.
With computers it's a different space framed within this reality a Turing complete system or accelerator of a process range within this turing compute space.
Work in computers and mathematics can spin off into the realm of science but the truth of compute space and the truth of all reality are 2 different spaces one real one emulated if we're not actually in a turingverse right now however it's properties are odd for whats possible with such technology if it was but maybe more of a norm for some type of natural reality.
What someone may be expressing with shots in the dark as a less renowned person might look like a person who is pushing something too ambiguous to bother pondering. However such shots in the dark may actually be real world analysable issues that like blue sky research may yield results.
If you are more renowned more people may hear you but sometimes with such shoots in the dark more interesting people might actually be listening and clocking any possibly useful shots you make especially these day where you can publish and communicate on the internet.
This issue can lead to some misguided critisism and a degree of Psudo scientific institutional profiteering on top of the struggles of life.
With computers it's a different space framed within this reality a Turing complete system or accelerator of a process range within this turing compute space.
Work in computers and mathematics can spin off into the realm of science but the truth of compute space and the truth of all reality are 2 different spaces one real one emulated if we're not actually in a turingverse right now however it's properties are odd for whats possible with such technology if it was but maybe more of a norm for some type of natural reality.
What someone may be expressing with shots in the dark as a less renowned person might look like a person who is pushing something too ambiguous to bother pondering. However such shots in the dark may actually be real world analysable issues that like blue sky research may yield results.
If you are more renowned more people may hear you but sometimes with such shoots in the dark more interesting people might actually be listening and clocking any possibly useful shots you make especially these day where you can publish and communicate on the internet.
This issue can lead to some misguided critisism and a degree of Psudo scientific institutional profiteering on top of the struggles of life.
