What is a proof?

[justin]

Second you have it ass backwards

I didn't

Inductive logic: weak entailment, less dependable, conclusion not guaranteed (don't confuse this to not to lead to right reasoning)

It is not weak, it is less affirmative than deductive logic, but it can bring new information

Deductive logic: strong entailment, guaranteed conclusion, most dependable.

yes, but it is actually not bringing any new information, it is just formulating existing facts (Premises)

My point is: even if the proof is using Inductive logic (and you don't have something better)
It should be considered as a proof

1:It is weak because it relies on probability, deductive does not.
and i just said that

2: uhh i never said it brought new information, though it can be used to give new info its just that the example you used has already been recorded information.

Your point: deductive logic is better than inductive logic so i do have something better, i just explained this. No the premise holds the proof the logic holds the reasoning.

---

The reason for my avatar

read and learn:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%...s_theorems

I wonder how his hair ended up like that? Natural? Cool as fuck if you ask me.