RE: If homosexuality were preventable should it be prevented?
March 3, 2013 at 1:06 pm
(This post was last modified: March 3, 2013 at 1:13 pm by ideologue08.)
(March 3, 2013 at 1:00 pm)Question Mark Wrote:It's called a STRAWMAN. You're arguing against a proposition that I didn't make. I didn't say only gay people sodomize, and yet you felt the need to argue that.(March 3, 2013 at 12:54 pm)mo66 Wrote: Yes, of course, I can have an opinion on what people should or shouldn't do with their bodies. For example: People shouldn't do drugs, people shouldn't have gay sex.
Did I say that gay people are the only ones who sodomize? No. It's called building a strawman. This thread is specifically about homosexuality.
Oh, but it isn't a strawma though. You're using the appeal to emotion over the icky prospect of other people performing sodomy, and using that to persecute a single group, where as you'll dismiss the fact that heterosexuals doing it to further your condemnation of that single group.
That's not a strawman, that's what you're doing, and it's hypocrisy.
Yes, you can have your opinion, I would gladly stand up for your right to voice your opinion, but should you have the right to support laws that destroy other people's freedoms based on those opinions? No, just no. The mere fact that people do that is disgusting, because they would throw a hissy fit if someone did it to them
I oppose gay sex, whether you like it or not. I frankly don't care what you think about my opinions. Especially since you have nothing of value to argue with.
" but should you have the right to support laws that destroy other people's freedoms based on those opinions? No, just no"
Where did I support such laws? It's STRAWMAN after STRAWMAN! The debating here is absolutely appalling.
