RE: If homosexuality were preventable should it be prevented?
March 4, 2013 at 6:49 pm
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2013 at 6:54 pm by Violet.)
(February 27, 2013 at 9:50 pm)Question Mark Wrote: Or bisexual? Pansexual? Transsexual?
If it were made a choice, why not go broad? Why not be cured one way and then back the other way? It's an interesting prospect when it actually is a choice
Ahhhh.... what a singular S can do to a word. (/endpedantry)
The only cure I'd like for my transsexuality is a vagina, complete with ovaries, womb and general baby-making capabilities. The rest would pretty much just come with the territory
Not into fucking with people's heads without a very good reason for it... cure seems pointless, if there is no grandiose reason for it that I'm not yet made aware of.
(February 28, 2013 at 10:12 am)Question Mark Wrote: The salient difference between homosexuality and cannibalism in terms of the relationship between animals and humans, is that the concept of homosexuality on its own is entirely innocuous, whereas cannibalism as a way of life is intrinsically invasive on the lives of other people.
IE. those people getting eaten.
VORE~!
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
