RE: The difference between ethical atheism and nihlism is that ethical atheists have more faith
March 5, 2013 at 9:04 pm
(This post was last modified: March 5, 2013 at 9:05 pm by jstrodel.)
genkaus you are not arguing your points, you are just repeating what you presuppose. An argument is suppose to move from things which are self evident to things that are controversial, following established logical precedent. You are just repeating controversial points.
Please explain to me how naturalistic evolution can be teleological. How can you distinguish people as being the end of naturalistic evolution more than anything else evolution touches? And you can you consider evolutionary processes to be the goal of the forces that created them? Maybe if you are a Deist, certainly if you are Christian. Not as a naturalist.
Please explain to me how naturalistic evolution can be teleological. How can you distinguish people as being the end of naturalistic evolution more than anything else evolution touches? And you can you consider evolutionary processes to be the goal of the forces that created them? Maybe if you are a Deist, certainly if you are Christian. Not as a naturalist.
