If homosexuality were preventable should it be prevented?

[Angrboda]

(homosexuals are the only ones who should be answering this question and then only for themselves)

That raises an interesting question. How should the opinions of the homosexuals that would be prevented from ever existing be weighed? For some odd reason, I'm reminded of the church's historical attempts to stamp out contrary opinions by stamping out the people who hold them, literally.


Though I'll bite. What is your reasoning why only homosexuals should attempt to grapple with a question which has far ranging implications for medical ethics both for homosexuals and others whose birth might by some be considered undesirable?