RE: If homosexuality were preventable should it be prevented?
March 8, 2013 at 7:59 pm
(This post was last modified: March 8, 2013 at 8:01 pm by Shell B.)
(March 8, 2013 at 7:38 pm)catfish Wrote: It's a catch-22, but one that only a homosexual individual has the "right" to answer.
Wrong. We all have the right to free speech. Even you, which is unfortunate.
Quote:The point? Mind your own business, a homosexual will ask for your help if they need it.
.
Funny how you half-ass barge into a thread, assert yourself and then tell other people to mind their own business. How do you know I am not bisexual? How do you know I am not related to homosexuals who frequently express their gratitude that straights stand up for their rights? Who the hell are you to tell people not to defend human rights? As it stands, I'm not sticking up for gays. I am sticking up for babies. Leave people's genes alone. That includes those of any infants I may give birth to. However, I wouldn't mind a good old sweep of the internet dumbass gene. You know, people who don't read, but feel like they can articulate whatever stupid ass idea pops into their heads?
Catfish, what part of changing a baby's genetics is not letting them decide for themselves do you not fucking understand? We are standing up for letting people decide for themselves. You seem to think babies can make decisions before they were born. Yep, we need a solution for that dumbass gene and fast.
