So Eusebius believed and reported a hand written letter from Jesus, which he lost or his dog ate it, had the original copy of Matthew in the "language of the Jews", and lost that, and this guy has doubts that Second Clement was authentic? I dunno. There had to be a lot of proof, like a big sign "I AM A FAKE" stuck to the front of it for this guy to have any doubts!
“I've done everything the Bible says — even the stuff that contradicts the other stuff!"— Ned Flanders