But that would bring us back to the old "There is no such thing as objective morality, since that is a theological argument, not a social one, and without God there is no theology and without theology there is no morality and without morality there is no good or evil, and since there is evil, there is a God."
But that last statement is certainly BS, because since man made up the theology, to define Good and Evil, one would have to say that God got bored and said, "Hmmm, what kind of BS religion do I want to make up today...Oh, I know, I will knock up a virgin...no..no..wait...this is good...and I will birth myself through her...bwaa...ha...HA...HA...yes! Make it so!" And then he has to explain what is good, what is evil, they write it up, and from all of that we prove that God exists because, well, the very morality that we created in the first place is used to prove that there is a God!
Which is a BS argument at its best.
But that last statement is certainly BS, because since man made up the theology, to define Good and Evil, one would have to say that God got bored and said, "Hmmm, what kind of BS religion do I want to make up today...Oh, I know, I will knock up a virgin...no..no..wait...this is good...and I will birth myself through her...bwaa...ha...HA...HA...yes! Make it so!" And then he has to explain what is good, what is evil, they write it up, and from all of that we prove that God exists because, well, the very morality that we created in the first place is used to prove that there is a God!
Which is a BS argument at its best.
“I've done everything the Bible says — even the stuff that contradicts the other stuff!"— Ned Flanders
