RE: Objective Morals+
March 13, 2013 at 1:26 pm
(This post was last modified: March 13, 2013 at 1:49 pm by DeistPaladin.)
(March 13, 2013 at 1:14 pm)John V Wrote: you now have to prove that your morality is better than no morality,Done.
Quote:Is it immoral to eat meat ... Why or why not?Sometimes morality is just doing the least possible harm. Eating meat is part of the natural order and some may argue a requirement. Others who are vegetarian or vegan are so for moral reasons. I'll allow them to make their case.
Quote:I thought the point was for you to prove that one system of morality was the correct one.Actually, you originally asked me to prove secular morality was superior to Biblical morality and hence the relevancy of the fact that religious morality (the Bible included) has a conflict of interest.
Quote:I asked about the count for the entire Bible.The official count in the 10 Commandments should be good enough for you.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
