(March 13, 2013 at 4:12 pm)John V Wrote: No, expressing your opinion as to why you prefer a certain system of morality does not prove that such system is better than amorality.No, I offered you logical proofs.
Let me know if you have a logical argument to offer against anything that I offered.
Quote:Rape is part of the natural order.Rape is a choice. Eating is not. Next fallacious Reducto Ad Absurdum argument please?
Quote:You can’t tell me if it’s wrong to kill other sentient creatures, but claim that your morality is superior to the Bible’s?In a surprise turn of events in this discussion, I'll tell you I don't know everything and don't have all the answers.
*Dramatic Music Plays*
hock:...and this is the part where you prance around taunting, "Ha ha, you admitted it! You don't know everything! Therefore, Jesus!"
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
