(March 13, 2013 at 6:38 pm)John V Wrote: Likewise. I think your dodges and inability to say whether killing sentient creatures is immoral speak for themselves.
I noticed you've said nothing to defend the Bible on any of the disturbing verses and no-brainer issues like its prescription of how to properly rape your sex slaves. You want to talk about "basic moral issues" there you go.
You've also offered nothing against my logical arguments on what morality is aside from that's-just-your-opinion. Speaking of "dodges".
But I don't know everything and can't give you a quick, easy answer to complex moral dilemmas involving the animal rights vs. human rights and whether eating meat is inherently immoral so you're declaring victory, right?
I'll let the readers decide for themselves if you're done as well.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
