Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 22, 2024, 10:29 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Must all be proven?
#77
RE: Must all be proven?
(October 6, 2009 at 5:04 pm)zoso Wrote: In our western world today, we choose atheism as the logical path to live and believe.
Atheism is based on science, lack of belief in God, and evolution.
My question isn't defining what an athiest believes (so please don't reply with arguments directing towards the belief of atheism), but my question is must all be proven?

Do we need evidence to believe in something?
For proving the supernatural no longer makes it supernatural.
Have any of you walked on the Moon? No? Then how do you know you can do that?

And my question for evolution is...

If evolution is the foundation for life's existence, can anyone give me an example or show me how any species has naturally developed new information on its DNA?

If evolution is true, why is there no ape/man in existance today?

We see neat patterns and believe that's what happened, but does it always work like that?

Evolution holds no great proof. It's still a theory as religion is.

If evolution was proven there would no longer be religion.

I'm a grammar and atheist Nazi, and I have fixed your post.

Anyways... This post... Is, like, seriously... Ugh...

No, we don't need evidence to believe in something. We need evidence to know it's true.
We cannot just go out on a limb and say that when we find a twenty dollar bill it's the work of God. No, we rationalize and think. Maybe somebody dropped it? Was it that guy in front of you? Perhaps it's been here this whole time? I do not believe in something unless there's evidence for it, or else I just keep pondering whether or not it's true.

No, I have not walked on the moon. But you cannot walk on the Moon, first of all. You must skip. We have proof of this because of many, many videos. Not to mention the prisms put up on the Moon by... I forgot what mission it was... building them on the Moon.

And, no, we can't. Evolution is a hundreds of thousands of years process. We cannot root back to about 150 years and find changes in animal DNA; that's about the only time they decided to record anything in history. So we have to wait a long, long, long time until we can say for sure that evolution exists.

There is no ape man because there is no ape man. This question is idiotic, to be brutally honest...

I don't know what you mean by this question... (skips)

Evolution holds much proof, more proof than religion, anyways. Must I appoint you the fossils of prehistoric animals?

And, no. You're incorrect. If evolution is proven correct, idiotheists would still reject the idea and say that it's all wrong. Plus, there are plenty of people out there (including today's Pope) that believe God and evolution have a relationship with each other. In other words, they think that part of the Bible is wrong and that evolution is indeed true, as well as God.

You didn't do your research, but then again, neither did I. xD
╔═╪══╬═╦╦═╬══╪═╗
║♫ ♪ ♫ ♪ McGodless! ♪ ♫ ♪ ♫ ║
Bah-bah-bah-bah-bahhh~!
║♪ ♫ ♪ ♫ I'm lovin' it! ♫ ♪ ♫ ♪║
╚═╪══╬═╩╩═╬══╪═╝

"And God said, drunk, 'Let there be Tails Turrosaki,' and there was Tails."
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Must all be proven? - by zoso - October 6, 2009 at 5:04 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Violet - October 6, 2009 at 5:38 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by zoso - October 6, 2009 at 5:45 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theVOID - October 6, 2009 at 5:52 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Violet - October 6, 2009 at 5:59 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by lilphil1989 - October 6, 2009 at 6:12 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by leo-rcc - October 6, 2009 at 6:14 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theblindferrengi - October 6, 2009 at 7:44 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theVOID - October 6, 2009 at 7:46 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theblindferrengi - October 6, 2009 at 7:52 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 6, 2009 at 8:11 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theblindferrengi - October 6, 2009 at 8:22 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 6, 2009 at 8:27 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theblindferrengi - October 6, 2009 at 8:48 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 7, 2009 at 5:14 am
RE: Must all be proven? - by Retorth - October 7, 2009 at 2:03 am
RE: Must all be proven? - by Violet - October 7, 2009 at 2:25 am
RE: Must all be proven? - by theblindferrengi - October 7, 2009 at 2:37 am
RE: Must all be proven? - by Violet - October 7, 2009 at 3:08 am
RE: Must all be proven? - by Retorth - October 7, 2009 at 11:42 am
RE: Must all be proven? - by Minimalist - October 7, 2009 at 11:47 am
RE: Must all be proven? - by Meatball - October 7, 2009 at 1:59 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Tiberius - October 7, 2009 at 9:06 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 8, 2009 at 3:45 am
RE: Must all be proven? - by downbeatplumb - October 10, 2009 at 9:12 am
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 12, 2009 at 6:50 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theVOID - October 12, 2009 at 7:11 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theblindferrengi - October 8, 2009 at 10:32 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 9, 2009 at 4:39 am
RE: Must all be proven? - by Amphora - October 9, 2009 at 3:19 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 9, 2009 at 4:38 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Amphora - October 9, 2009 at 5:02 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Violet - October 12, 2009 at 12:47 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 12, 2009 at 7:29 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theVOID - October 12, 2009 at 9:30 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theblindferrengi - October 12, 2009 at 9:42 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 13, 2009 at 2:44 am
RE: Must all be proven? - by Violet - October 13, 2009 at 1:48 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Amphora - October 13, 2009 at 4:07 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 13, 2009 at 4:17 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Violet - October 13, 2009 at 5:00 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 13, 2009 at 7:02 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theblindferrengi - October 13, 2009 at 8:11 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by leo-rcc - October 14, 2009 at 4:52 am
RE: Must all be proven? - by Violet - October 14, 2009 at 2:48 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Retorth - October 14, 2009 at 2:49 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Violet - October 14, 2009 at 3:02 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Retorth - October 14, 2009 at 3:20 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Donna99 - October 16, 2009 at 8:24 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 17, 2009 at 4:28 am
RE: Must all be proven? - by theVOID - October 21, 2009 at 12:12 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Edwardo Piet - October 18, 2009 at 2:06 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 18, 2009 at 2:26 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 21, 2009 at 3:32 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theblindferrengi - October 22, 2009 at 8:26 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 23, 2009 at 7:36 am
RE: Must all be proven? - by theVOID - October 23, 2009 at 8:43 am
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 23, 2009 at 1:50 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theVOID - October 23, 2009 at 2:20 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 23, 2009 at 2:44 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theVOID - October 23, 2009 at 2:50 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 23, 2009 at 2:53 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theVOID - October 23, 2009 at 2:57 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 23, 2009 at 3:56 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theVOID - October 23, 2009 at 4:41 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Violet - October 23, 2009 at 4:29 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 23, 2009 at 4:59 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theVOID - October 23, 2009 at 5:04 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 23, 2009 at 5:18 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theVOID - October 23, 2009 at 5:32 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by fr0d0 - October 23, 2009 at 5:50 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Edwardo Piet - October 26, 2009 at 6:20 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Amphora - October 28, 2009 at 1:11 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Edwardo Piet - October 29, 2009 at 5:22 am
RE: Must all be proven? - by chris - November 15, 2009 at 12:38 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by padraic - November 15, 2009 at 9:50 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Tails Turrosaki - November 15, 2009 at 10:43 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by littlegrimlin1 - November 15, 2009 at 11:20 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by downbeatplumb - November 16, 2009 at 2:22 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Violet - November 16, 2009 at 2:31 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by downbeatplumb - November 16, 2009 at 3:17 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theblindferrengi - November 18, 2009 at 9:18 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Autumnlicious - November 19, 2009 at 3:48 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by padraic - November 19, 2009 at 11:49 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by leo-rcc - November 20, 2009 at 4:15 am
RE: Must all be proven? - by Violet - December 1, 2009 at 4:18 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Autumnlicious - December 1, 2009 at 7:43 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by Sudekai - November 30, 2009 at 8:10 pm
RE: Must all be proven? - by theVOID - December 1, 2009 at 1:28 am
RE: Must all be proven? - by Rhage - December 1, 2009 at 10:22 am
RE: Must all be proven? - by Edwardo Piet - December 1, 2009 at 11:37 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  We must de-stigmatize eugenics Alexmahone 62 6682 August 17, 2018 at 5:29 pm
Last Post: Joods
  It must be true, because it's a Catholic study Foxaèr 15 1974 January 14, 2018 at 6:38 am
Last Post: notimportant1234
  Darwin Proven Wrong? sswhateverlove 165 22949 September 15, 2014 at 2:57 pm
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  The Earth must be older than 7000 years, then! pocaracas 5 2743 April 25, 2013 at 7:18 pm
Last Post: JesusHChrist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)