(March 19, 2013 at 5:45 am)Aractus Wrote:(March 18, 2013 at 11:24 pm)Godschild Wrote: You are correct to the point of bothers and sisters marrying and having children, at the time it was not considered incest, the gene pool was nearly perfect and began to be degraded with time. This was due to sin and it's continued effect on mankind.Really? So it wouldn't have anything to do with the fact that incest wasn't made a sin until Leviticus 20? No actually, you show me using your Bible where it says anything about the human gene pool being "nearly perfect".
Oh god there is so much wrong with that reasoning too...

So there was a time when incest wasn't sinful, to you? Interesting proposition. It doesn't really match up with the kind of objective moral standard that christians tend to assert they have. God just decided incest was sinful at the point of Leviticus 20? Sounds like divine command to me!
Other than that, does this time-locked version of sin and morality extend to other things? I mean, was there a time when murder was morally okay, before the commandments? This is really weird to be thinking about

"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!