It appears that there is common misconception that some people have on the meaning of a scientific theory. For something to become a theory it must have lots of evidence so when I refer to the theory of evolution I am saying that it has been repeatedly proven and well tested. Just compare definitions of a scientific theory vs a non-scientific theory http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory
You can see that it has a different meaning.
The closest word in science that has the closest meaning to the theory with a non-scientific context is hypothesis. God is a hypothesis that is being proven wrong as more and more studies are being published that show that there is no god. Even with the understanding of the word theory when referring to a scientific context one may ask why evolution is not a law this page does a very good job explaining it http://www.evolutionfaq.com/faq/why-isnt...idered-law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory
You can see that it has a different meaning.
The closest word in science that has the closest meaning to the theory with a non-scientific context is hypothesis. God is a hypothesis that is being proven wrong as more and more studies are being published that show that there is no god. Even with the understanding of the word theory when referring to a scientific context one may ask why evolution is not a law this page does a very good job explaining it http://www.evolutionfaq.com/faq/why-isnt...idered-law