(March 26, 2013 at 2:08 pm)cato123 Wrote:(March 26, 2013 at 1:56 pm)catfish Wrote: So, you equate studies which suggest things as being conclusive?
Alex,
I'll take aquatic species beginning with 'c' that have no fucking clue how science works for $1000.
LOL, I suppose this section from the study tells you otherwise?
Quote:This concludes the résumé of twin studies of homosexuality conducted to date. Clearly, many of these studies have (sometimes severe) methodological shortcomings. As Parker (1964) notes, "as long as there is an associated stigma attached to any deviation from normal sexual behaviour, difficulty will be experienced in obtaining co-operative twin pairs, and this has been repeatedly emphasized in the literature." Even if we just consider the less selective reports, there is still considerable debate as to how much the results of any twin study can tell us of the relative strengths of genetic and environmental factors. These problems are discussed in the next section.
http://www.tim-taylor.com/papers/twin_st...udies.html
So, let me know when you learn "how science works"...
